On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Markus <universe@truemetal.org> wrote:
Am 28.06.2014 15:05, schrieb Justin M. Streiner:
Have you contacted your local police, or the German equivalent (the
BKA?) of the United States' FBI?
[...]
My personal opinion is that having a PI go to the individual's house
would not accomplish more than 'tipping your hand' to that person - letting them know that you've committed resources to tracking them down.
I haven't contacted any law enforcement agency yet, because I'm not yet certain which one(s), where, and whether it's a good move at this point. According to my experience, German police is too slow, even if it's just passing on the case to the next "higher" agency. Somehow I think it would be most effective to have several investigations, that I start by myself, in parallel. E.g. in Russia -> collect the data of the person who's paying for the domain/hosting, so I guess I need a lawyer in Russia to contact sledcom.ru (the Russian equivalent of the FBI, I think), who in turn hopefully will make the Russian hosting provider provide that data. At the same time, a lawyer in the US to do the same for the phone number. In parallel, the same for the US hosting providers that were used in the past by that individual.
But, before I can do all that, won't I need sufficient proof?
If you've been a victim of extortion, the simple existence of the threat and demand for payment is proof enough for law enforcement to start an investigation. More information can sometimes be helpful, but you run a risk of tainting evidence if you go too far on your own, which may end up hurting the case in the long term. If you obtain proof through illegal or questionable means, it generally can't be used as part of the case against them.
What I have at this point is a phone number, but I cannot be sure that the connected name and addresses, which I found solely based on web research, is accurate, and even if they were, that's no evidence for anything. This is why I came up with the PI idea, which I didn't explain properly enough. I didn't mean the PI to knock at some doors and say "Hello there, Markus from Germany sends me, are you <name>?" - hehe. :) I meant that the PI should perform surveillance and observe who's arriving and leaving, and if a person matches the picture I provided or maybe ethnicity/age, walk up to him and ask for the way to the bus stop or something, in order to check whether his voice matches. If it does, and if the PI can document this in a way that can be used in court, I have an address and a name I can use to pass to lawyers/law enforcement.
When I write all this I always have in mind that law enforcement research is slow. Talking about Germany now, don't know about the US. Especially in a case like this where no life is in danger or where there's no other immediate threat. This is why I'm thinking: I better do/initiate as much research as I can by myself. Once I've collected everything I can from all kinds of sources I'll throw the whole bunch of documents to a lawyer/LE in the US.
Doesn't make sense? Wrong thinking?
Thanks! Markus
It depends on your goal. If your goal is to get this person off your back quickly, yes, law enforcement can often seem slow. But taking action on your own could end up thwarting the longer-term goal of making sure this person is never able to do it again, in that if you obtain proof through means that do not fall within the strict law enforcement guidelines, they may escape prosecution based on those technicalities. It would be far better to start working with law enforcement now, to ensure the investigation doesn't create loopholes they can crawl out of later as the noose tightens. Matt