-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes <tomb@byrneit.net> wrote:
That's funny.
You're assuming that the MLAT [1] process works -- it doesn't.
He's also assuming that US on-shore law applies, which it doesn't when any one party is a non-US person, at which point it passes to the real of National Security.
Well, that's another issue entirely, but you are right. :-) Unfortunately, folks in charge of "national security" with regards to cyber issues don't realize that if that they can't stop sophisticated Eastern European criminals from their ongoing pillage & plunder, they will *never* stop determined attempts at critical infrastructure, espionage, etc., because they will simply use similar techniques. This is serious stuff, and it is so damned pervasive, and happening right in plain sight. - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003) wj8DBQFLPD2eq1pz9mNUZTMRAq7iAKCLDdKPRBp1EkrkIcQRG04pJZwmqgCfSA2k jmEF+raHPkEGUsp6n5ZfgoI= =UVPA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawgster(at)gmail.com ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/