Scott Helms wrote:
Numbers? Examples?
Greenfield SS and PON deployment costs in Japan was already shown.
Japan has one of the highest population densities of major economies in the
The examples are in rural area and I already stated population density in English.
No, the only reason to insist on PON is to make L1 unbundling not feasible.
I don't know what conspiracy theory you're ascribing to here, but this is incorrect.
PON being more expensive than SS, that is the only explanation.
No, SS is cheaper than PON without exception.
Prove it.
See above or below.
If the initial density of subscribers is high, SS is fine.
If it is not, initially, most electric equipment, OE port, fibers, splitters and a large closures containing the splitters of PON can not be shared by two or more subscribers, which means PON incurs much more material and labor cost for each initial subscriber than SS.
Masataka Ohta