Actually, I did... I doesn't seem too on the level. With lines like:
Even we don't block, we just send a 471 reply and let the monkeys determine whether the e-mail looks legitimate or spammy.
However, after explaining all this about 127.0.0.2, there is a little note on the bottom:
What does 127.0.0.4 mean?
Not much, it's the only code we return, "not whitelisted" is perhaps the most accurate description.
Guess the number returned for us ? Ironic, at least. Were it not referenced by http://Relays.OsiruSoft.com./, Frankly, I would care less. * Hint * Hint * Lionel wrote:
On Sat, 09 Mar 2002 07:04:36 -0500, Richard Irving <rirving@onecall.net> wrote:
Hello, we are currently having a problem with a vigilante block list in the netherlands... I figure this is as good a forum as any....
The boilerplate: Please see <http://selwerd.cx/xbl/>, xbl is a *local* list, it would cost us time to check whether we can whitelist your IP. [...] How would one approach -this- ?
I would start by reading the web page in the URL you quoted. You might find it illuminating.
-- W . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------