PHB? Then make it a cost argument. "If you plan an implement V6 today, will will cost N. If you delay until you discover V6 only services, it will cost 3-5xN to implement quickly, with additional risk of additional costs because quicker implementations are likely to miss something along the way." On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:47 PM Brian J. Murrell <brian@interlinx.bc.ca> wrote:
On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 12:12 -0400, John Levine wrote:
There are perfectly good reasons to use v6: no NAT in front of your devices,
Check.
every service gets its own IP,
Roger.
better connections to devices on mobile networks and home networks that are behind v4 NATs.
Bingo!
All very good reasons, and in fact every one of them are my primary reasons.
But the came I am making is to PHBs, not engineers and I am trying to find a path of least resistance.
b.