7 Sep
2001
7 Sep
'01
11:51 a.m.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:
|> True... neither does a well-firewalled LAN.
There is a substantial difference between broken access and controlled access.
Yes, but there are plenty of apps that will not work if you do not leave open large, arbitrary ranges of udp ports. This is fundamentally incompatible with most sane firewalls. Or NAT. Why write a protocol that way? Just to prove NAT sucks? Charles