On Sep 29, 2023, at 14:11, Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote:/32s are perfectly valid in the DMS, but there is currently an IETF limit of ~500M of them (the other 3.5B are not yet released to the RIRs, only 2000::/3).OwenOn Sep 29, 2023, at 12:54, Collider <large.hadron.collider@gmx.com> wrote:This thread is utter amateur hour. I too would rather /32s be valid in the DFZ - but they're not, for good reason (worstcase scenario = circa 4 bln. routing table entries - no BGP hwaccel can swing that!).Le 29 septembre 2023 19:51:29 UTC, Seth Mattinen via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> a écrit :On 9/29/23 10:24, VOLKAN SALİH wrote:
you guys become rich this way.. by playing penny pincher.
I asked global firms like Huawei, not some local company called ADAMS!
You joined the wrong mailing list then. This is NANOG, which has companies of all sizes and private individuals operating networks. This is not a "global firms" mailing list.--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.