On Oct 29, 2021, at 6:55 PM, Denis Fondras <xxnog@ledeuns.net> wrote: Le Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Bill Woodcock a écrit :
If you’re peering with an MLPA route-server, you’re welcome to include just the route-server’s ASN, if that’s easiest, rather than trying to include each of the peer ASNs on the other side of the route-server. Either way is fine.
I have an agreement with the RS owner (IXP) but not with each participant. Should the contractual relationship be true or false ?
Sorry, we should have been more clear about that… This is just whether a bilateral contract exists between the two peering ASes. We’re looking at multilateral agreements separately, because two ASes may peer directly in some locations and via multilateral route-servers elsewhere. So with that question we just want to know whether there’s a bilateral contract. Thanks, -Bill