On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:29 AM Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net> wrote:
If networks are going to make unconventional announcements, I'm not concerned if they suffer because of it.
No, no no. You're not getting it. I'm a customer of Verizon. I'm a customer of CenturyLink. I get a /24 from CenturyLink and announce it via my two carriers: Verizon and CenturyLink. CenturyLink also announces the aggregate, let's say /16 that the /24 is a part of because all of the /16 containing my /24 is their allocation. Get it? I announce the /24 via both so that you can reach me when there is a problem with one or the other. If you drop the /24, you break the Internet when my connection to CenturyLink is inoperable. Good job! There is nothing unconventional about this arrangement. It was commonplace before ARIN dropped the minimum end-user assignment to /24 and many networks who themselves up that way have found it inconvenient to renumber. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill@herrin.us https://bill.herrin.us/