At 04:25 AM 13-11-04 +0000, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:00:54PM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
for those nodes that choose to use root-servers.org as a publication method, ...
as far as i know, the root-servers.org web site is 100% accurate, and has 100% participation amongst root server operators wrt publishing accurate information. if bill knows otherwise, i'd like him to say so, and offer specifics both as to what information is not present, and where it can be found today, and where it can be found in the future.
if bill is not actually aware of any missing information, i'd like him to say so, since it's possible to infer from his comments here that the web site is inaccurate or out-of-date in some way he's directly aware of, and i just don't think that's true. -- Paul Vixie
please remove all public informtion about "B" from http://www.root-servers.org. The public data about "B" on that site is not 100% accurate and does not have 100% participation amoungst root-server operators wrt publishing accurate information.
For what purpose? Is B (ISI) is need of more secrecy than say G (US DoD)? I always thought we strive for more transparency than for less. Perhaps if ISI can't play nice like all the other roots, I am sure there are many other organizations that would be happy to host B. -Hank
plesae be apprised that your thinking here is inaccurate.
--bill