--
Jamie.Reid, CISSP,
jamie.reid@mbs.gov.on.caSenior
Security Specialist, Information Protection Centre
Corporate Security,
MBS
416 327 2324
>>> "chuck goolsbee"
<chucklist@forest.net> 11/03/03 03:56pm
>>>
All,
Sorry, to interrupt any off-topic rambles, but I
had a client call
last week who had just had some telephone abuse heaped on
them, by
somebody accusing them of spamming. It turns out our client had a
netblock assigned to them back in the mid-90's. They used to put on
networking trade shows, and used the space for making show networks.
They haven't put on a networking trade show (with a public network)
since about 1997.
Of course to complicate the matter, the sole
contact listed in whois
no longer works there.
I informed our client
how to remove their name from the whois record
and relinquish the netblock
back to ARIN, which I hope they are doing
now.
I also have (at the
suggestion of some research through the nanog
archives) submitted the
netblock to the completewhois site.
[I have no interest in commenting on
the current inane OT nanog
thread about that subject, so don't even try
me.]
Mr. Thomas' cymru.com service was offline when I tried to contact it
last week (he replied via email about an outage... sorry to hear...
coffee will get there eventually. Order put to the roaster today. -
hang
in there.)
Of course I have no hard data, other than my client's phone
call
about another phone call, so I can't query based on a timestamp to
see where this was being announced from. It appears to vanished, and
has
remained so according to my casual glances here and there.
The netblock
in question is:
204.89.0.0/21
So, my question is: Other
than the above, and mentioning it here, is
there anything else *I* can do to
assist my client? Especially since
I am not at all directly related to this
netblock in any way.
Additionally, it would not hurt to know if anyone here
*does* know
when or where the announcement came from.
The client
in question are good folks, and I hate to see their
reputation tainted by
the actions of others.
Thanks,
--chuck goolsbee,
digital.forest