-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Florian Weimer wrote:
* Stephen J. Wilcox:
packet inspection will just evolve, thats the nature of this problem.. there are things you can find out from encrypted flows - what the endpoints and ports are, who the CA is. then you can look at the characteristics of the data.
These protocols typically don't use a PKI. You could look at public keys, but you don't even have to distribute them in-band.
What you can do is look at packet sizes and do timing analysis on incoming and outgoing packets to a particular hosts. For example, it is possible to use such techniques to detect an interactive SSH connection to a particular host on your network which is used by an attacker to control an SSH client which connects to some other host. I don't know how this scales to tens of thousands of hosts, though.
Apart from that, I do not really understand the concept of "bandwidth management". Isn't this this just an euphemism for "content management", to avoid the ugly "c" word?
In my complete ignorance, I would think that this is part of it certainly, but would be mostly qos issues. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDHd+50STXFHxUucwRAnECAJ9zU2jRyCVB/ViE6vyELChQKASlDACglOk9 4aP9ur2gJ+CpQCdaIqE+ZAk= =1BZ/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----