27 Sep
2013
27 Sep
'13
12:50 a.m.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:29:17PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
On 9/26/2013 1:52 AM, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
sounds just like folks in 1985, talking about IPv4...
The foundation of that, though, was ignorance of address space exhaustion. IPv4's address space was too small for such large thinking. IPv6 is far beyond enough to use such allocation policies.
when concevied, IPv4 was unimaginably large ... /8's were handed out to networks with fewer than 10 devices. Hindsight is 20/20. "those who ignore teh past are doomed to repeat it" /bill