Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 19:07:47 GMT From: "internetguy205@hotmail.com" <internetguy205@hotmail.com>
Am I correct that NANOG participants are to give their REAL names? Before judging others, at least play by the rules. Sorry, but on this list, a Hotmail address just seems... tacky. If you wish to speak up, identify yourself. If you haven't enough faith in your messages to claim them... Yes, the support -- or lack thereof -- sounds rather scary. But personally I'd rather get blasted by { Randy | Paul | Daniel | Avi | Patrick | Bill | Bill | Sean | Sean | ... } and get something from it than to have sugar-coated puff talk and drivel. Not that I always agree with all of them by any means -- but a high enough clue concentration SHOULD make one stop and think WHY they say what they do. The relationships here are peer-to-peer, not customer-vendor. Such is the way that geek lists run. (And I'm just a baby -- inet-access in '97 was my first list -- "basement multihomer".) -- Eddy Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com> To: blacklist@brics.com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.