Agreed, Microsoft process is painful with forced to use the azure interface. Meta and cloudflare have nice portals that use peeringdb for auth.
And so many of those bilateral processes are just simply broken.
-----Mike HammettIntelligent Computing SolutionsMidwest Internet ExchangeThe Brothers WISP
----- Original Message -----
From: Will Hargrave <will@harg.net>
To: Tom Beecher <beecher@beecher.cc>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 11:22:34 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: Can an IXP sell IP transit?
On 5 Nov 2024, at 16:56, Tom Beecher wrote:
>> Especially so if a few of the large content providers continue to pull
>> back from route servers and such.
> Content providers aren't leaving IXP's completely. They're still there,
> still paying monthly for ports and XCs. Still doing bilateral peering over
> the IX. There's no revenue hit to an IXP for a CDN to de-peer off the route
> servers.
Hi Tom,
I don’t really think your last statement is true.
UK, and London in particular, is quite a dynamic market. At LONAP we see plenty of networks connect and see an immediate “quick win” of traffic by connection to our route-servers, where adoption among the membership is something like 85-90%.
If an operator decides to replace those RS sessions with a (often intractable) portal to request bilateral sessions - or worse, email - that immediate traffic benefit is lost. That can affect the value the IXP provides to its members.
Will