On 24/09/2013, at 12:02 AM, Job Snijders <job.snijders@atrato.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:28:58PM +1000, Geoff Huston wrote:
On 23/09/2013, at 8:01 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
I look forward to the day when we have proper 32 bit BGP community support and ASN32s finally become usable on nontrivial networks.
Is there some reference that describes the problems with the use of RFC5668? I was not aware that there were residual issues here.
It would've been really nice if one could fit more than 16 bit in the locally administrated part.
Kind regards,
Job
I'm sorry, but I'm still confused, as I see your comment as one that relates to the size of the payload field here, as distinct from the support for 32 bit AS numbers per se. Geoff