I have used the BeagleBone to run a few simple servers. I don't know if the ethernet port on the Bone is on the USB bus. It is slightly more expensive than a PI, but they have worked well for me. Geoff On 02/18/2015 04:44 PM, Peter Loron wrote:
For any site where you would use a Pi as the DNS cache, it won't be an issue. DNS isn't that heavy at those query rates.
Yeah, it would be awesome if they'd been able to get a SoC that included ethernet.
-Pete
On 2015-02-18 15:08, Robert Webb wrote:
What I do not like about the Pi is the network port is on the USB bus and thus limited to USB speeds.
<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Maxwell Cole <mcole.mailinglists@gmail.com> </div><div>Date:02/18/2015 4:30 PM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: "nanog@nanog.org >> 'NANOG list'" <nanog@nanog.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances" for remote offices. </div><div> </div>