29 Jan
2008
29 Jan
'08
9:28 p.m.
Pretty good in the generalities, but there are few finer technical points that could be been precisely and accurately stated. One that comes to mind was the MD5 reference, another was the "50% loss" when talking about performing an optical split. Frank -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of michael.dillon@bt.com Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:47 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: potential hazards of Protect-America act I wonder if this is on topic? <http://www.crypto.com/papers/paa-ieee.pdf> Among other things, it discusses technical hazards of the act. --Michael Dillon