At 19:24 10/21/97 -0700, J.D. Falk wrote:
On Oct 21, "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian@blackrose.org> wrote:
Then perhaps it might of interest to start a meta discussion about problems of scalability of Gigaswitch based exchange points as well as possible future direction of such large exchange points?
AFAIK, there are only two types of exchanges out there today:
1. Switched Ethernet and/or FDDI 2. ATM
We all know switched ethernet doesn't scale by itself, which is why we've gone to switched FDDI.
And, it's quite possible that we're reaching the end of scalability for switched FDDI -- unless, of course, some amazing new technolgy comes along and fixes everything in one swell foop.
FDDI is a finished standard and no more bandwidth upgrades are planned. Ethernet, however, is now in the gigabit range. It may be extended to operate in the multi-gigabit range, if the IEEE decides the frame format and the media access method will work at such speeds. Products based on GbE are in use today. A NAP can drop in one or two GbE switches, connect them to existing GIGAswitch/FDDIs, and scale (somewhat) from there. Come to NANOG this next week to see how this can be done. The nice thing about the GbE switches (I note the Prominent Cajun P550 and the DEC GIGAswitch/Ethernet switches) is that they give you instant access to over 45 Gbps of (almost) non-blocking switch fabric. GigaLabs has a monster of a switch with over 128 Gbps of non-blocking fabric (GbE uplinks only however). The only downsides right now with most current GbE switches is that they only support 10/100BASE and GbE uplinks, offer no QoS and limited flow-control mechanisms. The flow-control protocol for GbE has not yet been finalized by the IEEE. All implementations of this are vendor-proprietary. (Be sure your vendor upgrades you to the Standard at no cost!). Connecting a router to a switch using a standard a Fast Ethernet adapter gives you 200 Mbps of full-duplex throughput. This is adequate for anyone with an OC-3 behind their router. Hell, anyone with more bandwidth into the NAP can probably purchase multiple Fast Ethernet links from the NAP operator. These adapters are less costly than full-duplex FDDI adapters, and the prices for switch ports and router adapters are declining. I think that GbE technology permits the NAPs to support increasing bandwidth requirements for the foreseeable future. Beyond that, maybe the ISPs with heavy-duty requirements should consider private interconnects outside the NAPs. Steven
Are the ATM-based NAP's having any problems with scalability these days? How far can they go?
Personally, I'd also be really curious as to any testing that people have done or are doing in terms of other forms of NAP fabric. Will gigabit ethernet save us all?
********************************************************* J.D. Falk voice: +1-650-482-2840 Supervisor, Network Operations fax: +1-650-482-2844 PRIORI NETWORKS, INC. http://www.priori.net
"The People You Know. The People You Trust." *********************************************************
**************************************************************************** **** Phone: 1.816.854.2113 Fax: 1.816.854.2201 Numeric Pages: 1.800.724.3329, PIN 398.6644 Alpha Pages: 1.800.724.3508, PIN 398.6644 Outside U.S.: +1.619.279.8495, PIN 398.6644 Text Page via Internet: 8882079104.3986644@pagenet.net **************************************************************************** ****