I have used Airya (found easily using google). Fast, cheap, has DES, an overall good experience. Cheers, Doug Douglas S. Peeples Technology Assurance Labs Co-Founder dpeeples@talabs.com www.TALabs.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of William Petrisko Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 9:08 PM To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Campus size Wireless LAN On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 04:03:18PM -0400, Brandon Pinsky wrote:
I just installed a Quickbridge 60 recently. It's pretty nice. The throughput is good over a .75 mile link. I was able to successfully push ~20Mbps with an iperf test. Installation was easy relative to some of the other equipment we have installed. The feed line is UTP and the radio gets power over the UTP cable. The uplink interface is 100BaseT which is easy. My only complaint is that it is not remotely manageable. You have to have direct console to make any config changes which means taking the link down. We have another .11a system in
I believe that this is fixed in the latest release of code... bill
production made by RadioLan and it is plagued by the same design flaw. Stupid... I'd like to compare it to the Cisco one. I bet it is more manageable.
BJ
On Jul 21, 2004, at 2:01 PM, Eric Brown wrote:
Anyone have experience with Proxim's tsunami quickbridge for wireless connectivity between buildings at line of site distances under 1 mile? It's cheaper than Cisco and looks good on paper. Looking for the good bad and ugly. Thanks in advance!
-Eric
-- Bill Petrisko