On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 07:33:45PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
On May 7, 2014, at 4:19 PM, Matt Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org> wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 05:57:01PM -0400, David Conrad wrote:
However, assume that the OpenBSD developers did document their protocol and requested an IESG action and was refused. Do you believe that would justify squatting on an already assigned number?
I'm going to go with "yes", just to be contrary. At the point that the IESG refused to deal with 'em, they've effectively been ostracised from "the Internet community", and thus they are under no obligation to act within the rules and customs of that community.
I don’t believe for one second that the IESG refused to deal with ‘em.
Neither do I. That wasn't the question I was answering, though -- the scenario described was "assume that...". - Matt