22 Apr
2014
22 Apr
'14
8:01 a.m.
Le 2014-04-19 06:23, Florian Weimer a écrit :
I agree with Bill. You can poopoo NAT all you want, but it's a fact of most networks and will continue to remain so until you can make a compelling case to move away from it.
Does that mean all IPv6 firewalls should support NAT?
In the sense that they "MUST be able to provide email filtering features": yes.
That requirement should be removed.
Remember, we're aiming for a base set of requirements applying to all IPv6 firewalls.
The document has more than just base requirements.
The document is flawed as-is. Simon