24 Mar
2011
24 Mar
'11
4:26 p.m.
The judge definitely ruled that the transfer had to be done in a manner that complied with ARIN policy and made it clear that the recipient was, indeed, required to sign the RSA. So, yes, Kremen also lost on the address policy basis, which I believe may have been an additional ruling subsequent to what is covered at the cited URL. Owen Sent from my iPad On Mar 24, 2011, at 12:24 PM, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
On Mar 24, 2011, at 8:15 AM, William Herrin wrote:
Legacy address transferability has been disputed before. Kremen v. ARIN. Kremen lost.
Yes, Kremen lost, but not based on anything related to address policy:
http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2007/01/kremen_loses_ch_1.htm
Regards, -drc