8 Mar
2011
8 Mar
'11
4:42 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
Even more suspicious is the fact that there is no organisational information attached to the request and the sender used a gmail address. They supplied an Indian telephone number.
it is about this point where i realize that i am overloaded with real work, hit delete, and get back to that work.
I view this as an excercise in applied humor and in the potential scammer's RFC-1918 knowledge. "I can offer you 172.29.128.0/17 for the reasonable price of..." However, if Real Work is sufficiently important today, the amusement value of pursuing it is probably not worth it. -- -george william herbert george.herbert@gmail.com