This only protects ISPs from, upon being served notice, being liable for content A majority of the CDA was overturned, as it violates both first and fifth amendments. What is left of it only applies to ISPs PUBLISHING (*not* filtering) content This is Net Neutrality realm On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Andrew D Kirch <trelane@trelane.net> wrote:
William Pitcock wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 23:15 -0700, Shon Elliott wrote:
Okay, so how do YOU block the attacks from eating up your bandwidth and filling up your logs without blocking the entire IP?
If I was AT&T, I would purchase DDoS filtering equipment and run it at edge where all of my traffic is peering anyway.
This discussion is about AT&T, not you.
William
While I agree, I certainly believe that due to the nature of some of the content on 4chan, AT&T can make a strong "Good Samaritan" claim under 47USC230. There's always TOR.
Andrew D Kirch