5 Dec
2010
5 Dec
'10
5:38 p.m.
On Dec 5, 2010, at 1:32 PM, James Hess wrote:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Mark Radabaugh <mark@amplex.net> wrote:
of running RIPng. The thought of letting Belkin routers (if you can call them that) into the routing table scares me no end.
I think that indeed looks scary. I wouldn't be too concerned about the Belkin routers. How many SP routers are really designed to deal with mass numbers of RIP adjacencies?
RIP doesn't have adjacencies, per se. It's basically a stateless broadcast based protocol. As such, the number of routers really has no major impact other than the traffic level generated by all those broadcasts. Owen