I took that as path agnostic. On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com
wrote:
"In the presence of layer-3 load-balancers, a multiplexed transport has
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Phil Fagan <philfagan@gmail.com> wrote: the
potential to allow the different data flows, coming and going to a client, to be served on a single server." - Google
I'll drink the juice
i don't think much juice is required... doesn't that just say that the same 'flow' will follow the same path through the network? and that most/all (save a10/yahoo!) loadbalancers just LB based on 5-tuple (at best)? so keeping things in a single flow/stream/5-tuple will drop packets from one host deterministicaly on a single other host at the far side?
-- Phil Fagan Denver, CO 970-480-7618