9 Mar
2011
9 Mar
'11
2:35 a.m.
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Randy Bush wrote: :: a real use for the diffserv bits! why not flowlabel in 6? it's been :: looking for a use for a decade. Honestly, we figured flowlabel might actually find a use before all the values of diffserv will :) In all seriousness, we are starting to set the spec for v6 l3dsr now, so, if you care, and believe that flowlabel would be a better field to "hijack" (or have a suggestion for another, better way then same DSCP methodology that we used for ipv4), we welcome input.. Thanks, -igor (yahoo)