Peter Kaminski wrote:
Matthew Kaufman writes about the Ames FDDI ring saturation:
What I don't understand is why that has _stayed_ saturated... it seems to me that some of the big players would have rerouted their traffic by now to avoid subjecting it to this, which would also have the side effect of causing the problem to, at least for the short term, go away.
...or why MFS hasn't installed a Gigaswitch there, or whatever. We're seeing 20% - 30% packet loss through AGIS to MCI and Sprintlink during the day, and it's not fun.
Speaking of fddi rings, saturation, and packet loss.. has anyone taken a look at the peering between mcinet and cicnet at the chicago nap? i get about the same (20-30%) packet loss during the day. and no, it's not fun at all. -- panic@cyborganic.com