26 Aug
2002
26 Aug
'02
12:25 p.m.
mjc@cooper.org.uk (Martin Cooper) writes:
OK - but unconditionally permitting null-return paths means that spammers can drive a coach and horses through the hole it leaves. :-(
that's how the proposal is optional. spammers who lie about their source/return addresses using nonexistent domain names are not the subject of http://www.vix.com/~vixie/mailfrom.txt; rather, i'm trying to address the issue of spammers who lie about _existing_ source/return domain names. -- Paul Vixie