19 Sep
2011
19 Sep
'11
7:59 a.m.
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:17:57 PDT, Cameron Byrne said:
Call me optimistic but .... ipv6 does not have these issues...
For anyone making STRATEGIC choices about ipv4 investments... beware of sharks in these waters, not just the cgn pains
For many of us (especiially the ones who have ipv6 deployed already), the problem isn't *our* strategic choices, the problem is the less-than-strategic choices made by the network owning the other end of the connection. If we're ready to talk over IPv6, but the other end instead decides to try to talk to us over a NAT444 or from a prefix that's got sketchy history, there really isn't much we can do about it.