Notwithstanding that fact that keepalives are a huge issue for tiny battery powered devices. There's a false economy in assuming those packets wouldn't have to be sent with IPV6... Marc Manthey wrote:
evening all ,
found an related article about the power consumtion saving in ip6.
-
Up to 300 Megawatt Worth of Keepalive Messages to be Saved by IPv6?
http://www.circleid.com/posts/81072_megawatts_keepalive_ipv6/
http://www.niksula.hut.fi/~peronen/publications/haverinen_siren_eronen_vtc20...
still interested in other links and publications
regards
Marc
-- "Use your imagination not to scare yourself to death but to inspire yourself to life."
Les enfants teribbles - research and deployment Marc Manthey - head of research and innovation Hildeboldplatz 1a D - 50672 Köln - Germany Tel.:0049-221-3558032 Mobil:0049-1577-3329231 jabber :marc@kgraff.net blog : http://www.let.de ipv6 http://www.ipsix.org xing : https://www.xing.com/profile/Marc_Manthey _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog