22 Sep
2003
22 Sep
'03
11 a.m.
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:45:13 -0000, "Stephen J. Wilcox" said:
Ok then different idea, assuming that we're all agreed its MS's responsibility to ensure users are patched promptly and without extra cost to the end user.
You agree. I agree. Microsoft doesn't agree, and based on the fact that the user presumably agreed to the EULA as phrased, the users don't either. After all, if the users didn't like the current support, they're free to change vendors. ;)