-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 All, Niels Bakker wrote:
* from_nanog@corenap.com (Albert Meyer) [Thu 28 Sep 2006, 21:47 CEST]:
Don't forget to CC all the traffic to NANOG list. Please don't do that. We don't need more pontification from Gadi. This new separate list sounds like a great idea, if only because it will distract him from NANOG-L. I don't post much but I read NANOG-L for
William Allen Simpson wrote: the operational content, and the off-topic posts generated by Gadi and his supporters/detractors significantly reduce the SNR. I've been sending him private emails asking him to stop polluting NANOG-L for some time, but those emails have had no effect, nor have the numerous public requests posted to the list by others. Hoping that another list will entice him away seems to be our only hope, and forwarding that list here would defeat the purpose.
Gadi's tactics in a nutshell:
1) develop a long-term habit of posting off-topic stuff to nanog 2) get called on it repeatedly 3) challenge what's supposed to be "on-topic" for the mailing list anyway 4) start a new mailing list in an attempt to take real content away from nanog 5) ??? 6) profit!
Don't fall for it, people.
-- Niels.
- --------------------------------- I apologize if I wasn't clear in my original e-mail. The outages mailing list is being run by me (virendra rode) with the only motive to help the network operator community. Gadi & Randy were nice enough to offer help w/ bandwidth and hosting this mailing list. I would really appreciate if folks can show some professionalism & keep their personal (non-operational) attacks off list. You are not being productive nor helping with the process. Email me directly and I will assist in resolving your questions and concerns. As far as the outages mailing list goes, this list will remain general Internet backbone style outage-centric mailing list and I welcome constructive criticism. Ideally (if I have better luck) I would like to get providers to direct outage notices to this list. All that really matters is that we have a central pace where network operators (nanog, sanog, isp-routing, cisco-nsp, etc) can post notice (backbone-types) of problems so that people are aware of them and can offer an informed answer. I would really appreciate everyones co-operation. Thanks for listening. regards, /virendra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFHUEdpbZvCIJx1bcRAnvMAKDRt9+eU4wBUvXGaEvorMWDNBJgtgCg1iaj nZZuud0MBS8wcVS7fyXThko= =4v3n -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----