Anyone in a network administrator position struggling with IPv6 (and not willing to fix that out of their own initiative) has no business running any network. You should hire better staff. On 10/13/2015 06:56 PM, Max Tulyev wrote:
On our network, we had to spent times more money in people than in hardware.
Customer support, especially network troubleshootings and so on...
So upgrade hardware and network admins are NOT sufficient for IPv6 adoption ;)
On 13.10.15 06:17, Ca By wrote:
On Monday, October 12, 2015, Donn Lasher <D.Lasher@f5.com> wrote:
Having just returned from NANOG65/ARIN36, and hearing about how far IPv6 has come.. I find my experience with <large US-based ISP> support today Ironic.
Oh wait..
Hi, my name is Donn, and I’m speaking for… myself.
Irony is a cable provider, one of the largest, and earliest adopters of IPv6, having ZERO IPv6 support available via phone, chat, or email. And being pointed, by all of those contact methods, to a single website. A static website. In 2015, when IPv4 is officially exhausted.
:sigh:
Tech support websites are long tail
Pragmatists are focused on getting ipv6 to the masses by default in high traffic use cases.
Sighing about edge cases in the long tail with ipv6 ... Not sure what you expect.
<deleted comments about f5 not supporting standard ndp, which has caused me outtages>
CB