On 10/21/16 3:21 PM, David Birdsong wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
anyone who relies on a single dns provider is just asking for stuff such as this.
randy
I'd love to hear how others are handling the overhead of managing two dns providers. Every time we brainstorm on it, we see it as blackhole of eng effort WRT to keeping them in sync and and then waiting for TTLs to cut an entire delegation over.
Not all the ones you might choose based on scale support axfr... That's a bit of a problem for the most traditional approach to this., of those that do it's straight-forward to use one as the master for another, or use a hidden master. Your own master may have demonstrably lower availability then one or the other of your providers. getting two well considered choices to play nice with each other isn't that hard.