On 2/8/12 08:59 , keith tokash wrote:
Hi,
I've done it either way, I prefer to put the v6 peers in a different group than the v4 peers so that I can group the policies at the group rather than neighbor level.
I'm prepping an environment for v6 and I'm wondering what, if any, benefit there is to splitting v4 and v6 into separate groups. We're running Junipers and things are fairly neat and ordered; we have multiple links to a few providers in many sites, so we group them and apply the policies at the group level. We could stick the new v6 neighbors into the same group and apply the policies at the neighbor level, or create new groups (i.e. Level3 and Level3v6).
This might sound a little nit-picky, but I'm concerned that there's a nuance I'm not thinking of right now and I don't want to be "that guy" who puts something in place and is cursed for a decade.
Thanks, Keith Tokash