6 Feb
2014
6 Feb
'14
7:58 a.m.
Don't fight it. It's clear that implementation on a per-packet basis of RFC4824 (datagrams over Semaphore Flag Signaling System) would have prevented this entire situation. Refer to sections 3.3 and 3.4. -j On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@mykolab.com> wrote:
On 2/2/2014 2:17 PM, Cb B wrote:
And, i agree bcp38 would help but that was published 14 years ago.
But what? Are you somehow implying that because BCP38 was "...published 14 years ago" (RFC2267 was initially published in 1998, and it was subsequently replaced by RFC2827)?