Hi, Maybe a bit more to explain. Up to now I asked the vendors to provide certain information before adding a box to the matrix. Apple was send a copy but they never responded. In future we are going to build the matrix upon user supplied data. See the article on the future of this work at http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/future-of-the-ipv6-cpe-survey-more-input-.... What we'll probably do is include everything for which there is a minimum number of responses like 5 or 10. Actual number to be decided upon once this is rolling and we can figure out the relevant number is. Grtx, Marco On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Franck Martin wrote:
What about an Airport Extreme? It has a wan interface that does PPPOE
The IPv6 feature seems working, with 6to4 or static tunnels and a basic IPv6 firewall.
Yes it is. I already reported to Marco. http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/content-ipv6-cpe-survey
It should be included somehow in a matrix But 6to4 (or other tunneling techniques) is only a substitute of real IPv6.
Regards, Janos Mohacsi
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mirjam Kuehne" <mir@ripe.net> To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM Subject: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
[apologies for duplicates]
Hello,
Based on new information we received since the last publication, we updated the IPv6 CPE matrix:
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated-january-2011
In order to make this information more useful for a large user base, we are preparing a detailed survey to gather more structural feedback about the range of equipment that is currently in use. Not only would we like you to participate in this survey, but we also ask for your help in identifying the right survey questions. Please find a call for input on RIPE Labs:
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/future-of-the-ipv6-cpe-survey-more-input-...
Kind Regards, Mirjam Kuehne & Marco Hogewoning RIPE NCC