On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Denis Fondras <xxnog@ledeuns.net> wrote:
Le 12/08/2014 17:15, Justin Wilson a écrit :
Another thing to consider is how you feel about the configuration. Mikrotik has a more polished GUI and command subset. UBNT is still working things out. A lot of what you have to to do with the UBNT line has to still be done in command line. If you are cool with that then not a big deal. The RouterOS is a pretty mature product and has a good backing of forums, wiki, and other things. Not saying uBNT doesnšt, just not as mature.
May we discuss IPv6 support ? Last time I checked, UBNT was lagging behind...
UBNT wireless operating system, AirOS, is lagging behind. UBNT router operating system, EdgeOS, has extensive IPv6 support in the command line interface. GUI has some IPv6 support ( http://wiki.ubnt.com/IPv6_-_GUI_Options). Rubens