8 Oct
2007
8 Oct
'07
12:49 p.m.
The nature of registry data leads to bugs like this, they should all be RIPENCC. jas James Aldridge wrote:
--On 8 October 2007 10:50:49 -0400 Jason Lewis <jlewis@packetnexus.com> wrote:
RIB IP Coverage for RIPENCC 312598027 13.9% RIB IP Coverage for RIPE 197332093 8.8%
Just out of interest, what's the difference between "RIPENCC" (the Regional Registry?) and "RIPE" (a vaguely defined group of people who contribute to the RIPE working group mailing lists and/or attend RIPE meetings and/or have some interest in IP networking in and around Europe and/or ... ?) here?
James