Nope, you underestimate politicians, they have consultants that are very smart.
Isolation is a tool of weakness. Some could not win, hence he isolates himself from the danger.
West/NATO still leading the war on the Internet. Then isolation does not make sense. The Internet is a good channel for influence. Hundreds of millions are spent on spreading FUD, and a different sort of propaganda.
The Internet has been a battlefield for a long time. I have seen it as it was started and progressed over 20 years. Russia was feeble initially, not capable at all (they could say “it was started not by us”). Russia is still weaker, thousands
of blocked sites is a sign of weakness.
I do not believe that Russia would ever be as professional as the West in brainwashing (Russia has strengths in different fields). Hence, the West would never start isolation on a wide scope.
Some particular ASes would be probably blocked sooner or later. Despite it would be a confession of some weaknesses.
West public opinion is the only thing that refrains politicians from starting blocking some ASes. IMHO: it would happen because there would be not enough progress on the other battlefields. Politicians would become a little desperate.
IMHO: the war would be driven to the Internet, like you or not. Fighting in all arenas/spaces was advice from all the biggest war theoretics (Clausewitz, Sun Tzu, etc).
Ed/
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+vasilenko.eduard=huawei.com@nanog.org>
On Behalf Of Alex
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 21:00
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Implementing Decentralized RPKI with Blockchain Technology
One country whose internet resources are nominally controlled by a RIR that's located in an enemy jurisdiction is Russia.
The Netherlands could not physically invade Russia to disconnect its servers or routers, but it could easily require the invalidation of Russian internet resources since RIPE NCC falls under its jurisdiction.
This would, as has already been stated, shatter the illusion of the Internet being a cohesive whole -- some people would be unable to access Russian internet sites, while other people would be unable to access European internet sites to which the formerly Russian
resources were reallocated.
Possibly the main reason this hasn't happened yet is that politicians don't understand what internet resources are, or how they're allocated, or what could be achieved by forcibly changing allocations.
On 15/11/24 18:11, Tom Beecher wrote: