On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com> wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Bret Clark wrote: ...
Seriously this has nothing to do with L3 but more with Netflix...it's clear that the Netflix business model is eating into Comcast VoD business and so they are strong arming other providers to affect Netflix's business model. But as others have stated what would happen if Comcast starts coming after every service provider's hosting services that Comcast doesn't like?
Comcast claims it offered Level3 the same CDN deal it has with other Netflix CDN competitors. Level3 didn't want the same deal. According to Comcast, Level 3 wants a 'special' deal. Of course, Level 3 spins it the other way and claims that it offered Comcast a settlement-free deal, but Comcast didn't want it now.
Keep in mind that the "previous" CDN deal that Comcast had was *charging* Akamai to host servers within the Comcast network, at least according to the scuttlebutt from the grapevine. Long-time listeners will recall that Patrick had long been talking about how Akamai doesn't run a backbone. Don't know if that's still true or not. Level3 _does_ run a backbone, and their normal model for handling traffic is to carry it along the backbone, and exchange it at major exchange locations; building racks in someone else's datacenter probably isn't their normal mode of operation, so it could be somewhat understandable as to why they might not have been as excited as Akamai was to pay for space, power, and bandwidth inside of Comcast's datacenters. I'm not sure I like the idea of pushing the Internet in the direction of putting copies of popular web sites into every eyeball network; if we're going to move in that direction, why not have the websites just email disks with content to the end users, and bypass the last mile network entirely? (oh, right, Netflix already had that model) Or, we could build a series of private networks, and depending on which network you chose to connect to, you can only access the content housed within the walls of that network. Get on NBC/Universal/Comcast, and you can only view their HuluPlus video streams. (oh, right--we had that too, with Prodigy/AOL/Compuserv) It really looks like someone is trying to wind back the clock, stuff the genie back in the bottle, and put the model for the internet back the way it was in the good old days of the walled gardens. It will be interesting to see whether the rest of the community feels like the good old days really were a better model for the Internet or not. *fetches popcorn, and kicks back to watch history {refold|unfold further}* Matt (speaking only for myself, with no true knowledge of the inside situations at any of these companies; everything mentioned here is pure hearsay, with no basis in established fact or reality. All opinions are mine, and mine alone; if my employer wants them, they'll have to pay extra for them, and I rather doubt they'd want them that badly.)