On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:56:09PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: [snip]
I am doing separate zone files. Each IP delegated to me is a separate zone. Now, again, what is wrong with that?
Technically, nothing -- at least, with the absolute latest authoritative nameservers and the absolute latest recursive/caching nameservers, and it doesn't seem to give much problems to modern resolver libraries.
['it will break with lots of software'] I am very willing to believe everything that you are saying, but *what part* of my configuration breaks those nameservers?
o The reverse zone contains one or more A records The reverse domain "192.122.109.193.in-addr.arpa." contains one or more A records. A records should only be placed in forward-mapping domains.
What A-records is it talking about? I am not seeing any.
They are the ones associated with your NS records. At a procedural level, PTR records are mutually exclusive with SOA & NS records.
But there are no A records in that zone. Again, what A-records? I have, by the way, enabled AXFR to the world for my reverse zones (all 16), so feel free to have a look. Also, I am aware that the hostmaster-address in the SOA for these zones is bogus - I will fix that shortly. Greetz, Peter -- peter@dataloss.nl | http://www.dataloss.nl/ | Undernet:#clue