From: "Matt Harris" <matt@netfire.net>
To: nanog@ics-il.net
Cc: brandonwade@yahoo.com, "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2018 4:48:45 PM
Subject: Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge
To: nanog@ics-il.net
Cc: brandonwade@yahoo.com, "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2018 4:48:45 PM
Subject: Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:41 PM Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net> wrote:
Maybe this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Service_Fundhttps://www.fcc.gov/general/universal-service
Kinda crappy they don't spell it out. Well, no, I guess USF would be closer to +-18%.
USF should not apply to IP transit connectivity wherein the connection between the transit provider and the customer does not cross state lines.