24 Jan
2006
24 Jan
'06
1:29 p.m.
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Joe Abley wrote:
On 24-Jan-2006, at 12:07, Robert E.Seastrom wrote:
He said "via two different autonomous domains", which I took to mean two upstreams... and my understanding is that (on ciscos anyway) you're talking per-packet, not per-flow load balancing.
If you can get two candidate routes for the same destination into the FIB, then you'll get per-flow load balancing as long as CEF is running, no?
that was my thought... and yes, it could get ugly for tcp services. Why would you knowningly induce this complication?