What I don't know, is why is it that SS7, the telephone routing protocol, can do some of the things that are required, like load sharing across unequal paths, for example. Does anyone have any insight into this?
I *believe* one main difference is that telco sig is connection oriented whereas IP is pretty much collectionless (interesting comparison to netflow switching though); hence telephony switching protocols can afford to wait tenths of seconds finding a route whereas this would not be an acceptable per packet switching overhead. Another is that signalling between switches is carried out-of-band (i.e. is not itself affected by line congestion) which is the bane of many routing protocols. Also note that esp on intl circuits there is still manual preening activity.
(prepares flame-suit for telco interconnect guru attack)
Alex Bligh Xara Networks
Alex, Connectionless and Connection oriented both refer to packet switched technologies, whereas the phone company uses circuit switched technology. Circuit switched means that the same wires/timeslots are dedicated to a call from the time it starts until the time it finishes. If you do not speak, the wires are idle/wasted. I am sure you understand packet switching. In a packet switched network, connectionless means that each packet has no state information, and stands alone, in the IP world we call this UDP. Connection oriented would be the equivalent of telnet or some other TCP service. SS7 (Signalling System 7) is a connectionless packet switched technology used to control the setup and teardown of circuit switched calls. Originally is was used as a database query technology to make 800 numbers portable across carriers. If this did not make sense I can descibe it in a little mnore detail offline. Larry Plato ANS CO+RE Systems