17 Jun
2015
17 Jun
'15
5:50 p.m.
There is already more than enough address space allocated for NAT, you don't need to start using random prefixes that may or may not be needed for other purposes in the future. For all we know, tomorrow someone could write an RFC requesting an address reserved for local anycast DNS and it could be assigned from this block. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Luan Nguyen <lnguyen@opsource.net> wrote:
Is that safe to use internally? Anyone using it? Just for NATTING on Cisco gears...
-- Ray Patrick Soucy Network Engineer University of Maine System T: 207-561-3526 F: 207-561-3531 MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network www.maineren.net