11 Jul
2017
11 Jul
'17
10:21 p.m.
Hence my mention of thinking it was a "sin" to subnet on the bit boundary in v6... again, I will do my best to never go back to bit boundary subnetting math in my v6 deployment. Actually, you folks are giving me bad flashbacks to my ATM H-PNNI days of pnni peer group nsap address subnetting. Oh how nice it was to view the atm switch nsap prefix in hex and view the peer group level's at the hex boundary until we got to a place where we needed to get a 4th level from 96-104.... I recall going with 98... we had to do bit boundary pnni level 98... I don't want to have to do that with v6 if I can avoid it -Aaron