14 Sep
2014
14 Sep
'14
5:34 p.m.
On 14/09/2014 22:19, Jimmy Hess wrote:
Any decent router won't allow you to enter just anything in that range into the export rules with a /6, except 2000:: itself
tarko is right in suggesting that config typos can cause this sort of thing, e.g. -- router bgp 65555 address-family ipv6 redistribute static ipv6 route 2001:418:3ef:1000::/6 2001:db8::1 -- Bear in mind that the "network" statement in the router bgp stanza on cisco routers is only one of several methods of injecting prefixes into a bgp rib, and is a method that many people routinely avoid because it means duplication of configuration: each network statement requires a grounding "ip{v6} route" statement in order to work stably. So why not combine the two? Nick